The Twinkie Diet
I suppose I’m probably the last health/fitness blogger to write about KSU Professor Mark Haub’s little weight loss experiment. The coverage has been practically nonstop, after all.
So why didn’t I discuss it last week, when it first hit the news?
To be honest, my initial thoughts were “so what?” From where I sit, there’s nothing the least bit radical about what he did. People have been losing weight on diets filled with highly refined/high sugar foods for a long time. Take the “Special K Challenge,” for example – how eating fortified, sugary bars and cereal differs from eating Twinkies + a protein shake + a multi is anyone’s guess. And Slim Fast… helloo? Sugar accounts for a substantial number of the cals in those shakes and bars.
So in principle, Haub’s diet was no different from any number of other sub-optimal, low-cal plans that work perfectly well, provided that simple weight loss (vs. physique optimization or improved long-term health) is the goal. Even with better-balanced diets, “calories in/calories out” still holds.
Even worse, it wasn’t even good science. Props to Dr. Haub for being more methodical than most dieters, but that’s about as much credit as I can give him. For my money, his story is a lot less interesting than Dr. Peggy Polaneczky’s… at least she was part of a controlled study that – from where I sit – appears far more newsworthy than Dr. Haub’s little, “n=1” experiment.
So tell me again… why is Haub’s story headline news???
Ok… on one level, it’s kinda catchy, ’cause Haub is a nutrition professor. Get it? That a nutrition professor lost weight eating junk food – of all things – has a contrarian feel to it… and the media loves contrarian stories.
But I can’t help but make a connection between the extraordinary popularity of Haub’s story and where I first saw it.
And no, it wasn’t on CNN, either.
Y’see, I’m a member of the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) – THE premier professional society for members of the food industry. Haub’s story – which was posted on IFT’s “ePerspective” blog – first appeared in my inbox on October 27… well before it hit the mainstream news cycle. And I can’t help but notice that – while it may be a non-story from a weight loss or scientific perspective – it’s a GREAT story from an industry POV.
So seriously, is it just a coincidence that – at a time when the food industry is facing widespread criticism over its role in promoting obesity – a catchy, IFT-sourced “you can eat a junk food diet and still lose weight” story is all over the news?
Ok, maybe it is… but let’s just say I’m skeptical. It fits just a little too neatly into the industry agenda, IMHO.
November 14, 2010
The Twinkie Diet – http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2010/1…
November 14, 2010
The Twinkie Diet – http://blog.ultimatefatburner.com/2010/1…
November 15, 2010
In my opinion the food industry has jumped all over this to take the heat off themselves. If I were in their shoes this guy would my hero.
Someone on the “band wagon” for junk food would be just what the Dr. ordered. I know he is’nt promoting junk food, but his results do nothing to show a bad light on them. Especially considering he is a “nutrition professor”.
November 15, 2010
He isn’t promoting junk food, no… but that’s the beauty of it. He’s reaffirming the industry line, which is “our crappy products can still be part of a healthy diet.” If you can lose weight on a diet filled with junk/convenience foods, then then the industry cannot be blamed for obesity. It’s all down to personal responsibility.
Ok, I’m all for personal responsibility, too. But then again, we all aren’t nutrition professors who are trying to prove points (which makes it a lot easier to exert control over cravings as well as tightly control intake). Nor have his results withstood the test of time – the problem with diets isn’t that they don’t work, or are difficult to do… it’s that they don’t stick. People typically revert back to their pre-weight loss habits. So why on earth is this guy being celebrated? It’s nice he lost weight – but he’s not the least bit unusual in this respect. It’s the maintenance that’s a killer – and that’s where a junk food-filled diet (even a maintenance version) is likely to be a loser.
November 16, 2010
Agreed. Any maintanence eating of “junk food” can only be a bad thing.